Evidence Yields: The failure of web-based ‘treatment’ for mental health

Computerised treatment of mental health is one of the latest fads in psychology. It isn’t hard to see why it is promoted by practitioners and policy-makers. That it exists at all demonstrates a triumph of technique over transference in psychotherapy of cost-effectiveness over clinical care; of the primacy of giving a narcissistic boost over a discursive exchange; and of the privatisation and individualisation of suffering rather than its socialisation. Computerised treatment is promoted uncritically by leading mental health groups in Australia, such as the Black Dog Institute, and Beyond Blue.

When it comes to the evidence, however, a comprehensive meta-analysis – the type of evidence prized by advocates of CBT and e-therapy – showed that such web-based approaches had a ‘significantly high drop-out rate’, no long-term benefits, and a significant publication bias. Which is entirely what one would expect.

My hypothesis: this evidence has not and will not deter policy-makers and advocates in the least when it comes to peddling these cheap, manipulative ‘therapies’.

“Thus it is,” says evidence.

“It cannot be” says ideology, and remains adamant.

At last – evidence yields.

Advertisements

One thought on “Evidence Yields: The failure of web-based ‘treatment’ for mental health

  1. Pingback: Theses on Mental Health Reform in Australia | Archives of a Divided Subject

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s